I just finished my advanced readers copy of Ron Irwin's Flat
Water Tuesday that I had won in a photography contest months ago. Grad
school being what it is, I haven’t read a book for pleasure in two months, so I
made up for lost time by reading Flat Water Tuesday in one day. I’ve
never read an advanced copy before and didn’t quite know what to expect. Aside
from some several continuity and misnaming mistakes, it was much like any other
book. As a reader those mistakes annoyed me, because for a moment they took me
out of the story. I had to go back, reread and make sure I was still following
who was speaking to who, or if I was still involved with the character who’d
been mentioned earlier. As a writer though, these mistakes did the opposite.
They fascinated me. Why did Irwin decide (apparently half way through the
story) that this character was from New York instead of Boston? Why did he
choose the names he did for his characters? How important was it that one
particular character said one particular thing to another? Changes, when left
unnoticed serve as a tiny insight into the authors process, something we don’t
often see in a finished work. But enough about the issues of my particular
copy; you are interested in the story itself.
Growing
up in New England and attending a small NESCAC college, I have a soft spot in
my heart for the preppy private school stories. I’ve read quite a few and they
never fail to intrigue me. Flat Water Tuesday fulfills the majority of
the stereotypes that run rampant in this prep school genre. Rob Carrey is a
scholarship kid who arrives at the Fenton School and immediately feels at odds
with the rich students. The emphasis on class differences dissipates as the
story continues, but the idea that poor kids and rich kids can never fully
understand each other is definitely there. Of course, then there is the
misunderstood rich kid stereotype that the character of Connor Payne fills
perfectly. Just because they have it all in terms of good looks, athleticism
and money doesn’t mean they don’t crave the affection of distant parents.
Connor is the charming, arrogant male that the protagonist must work against
until ultimately the two come to respect each other. Check. There is the dark
and mysterious female who intrigues but is off limits in someway, just waiting
to be the source of unrequited love. Check. Throw in the older coach/teacher
figure and a glorification of rule breaking and Flat Water Tuesday
easily joins the family of stories like The Starboard Sea, A Separate Peace and
Dead Poets Society. Where Irwin triumphs is when he breaks out of this
stereotypical mold, not only by bypassing the usual homosexual longings that
accompany stories of boys at boarding schools, but also instead giving the
reader solid, accurate depth in the rowing scenes of the novel, and using a complex
framing story to keep character perspective changing.
So
about that rowing. Basic plot of the book is Rob Carrey is a sculler from
upstate New York, comes to Fenton to do a post grad year and row. The team has
a race against a rival school that means everything and the training and
competition for this race makes up the bulk of the story. I probably enjoyed
this book more than most because I am a rower and a coach of the sport as well.
Irwin writes with accuracy about the finer details of rowing, although is
emphasis lies more with the pain of training than the near spiritual experience
of rowing down the river perfectly in time with the other athletes in the boat.
I am ok with this uneven representation only because I know the endless hours
of work that go into creating one perfect stoke. Perhaps other readers will now
understand that although rowing looks beautiful and effortless, a lot of sweat,
blood and tears go into making it look that way. A race is a fight to the death
inside the boat and inside a rower’s head.
Irwin
has a talent for putting us in the rower’s head and in the moment of the story.
Again, I might have appreciated this more being a rower. At one point Irwin is
describing the minutes just before an erg test and my stomach was in knots,
thinking back to all those times when I’d stood in front of an erg and prepared
to do battle. As I read that same horrible nervous feeling settled upon me and
when Irwin mentioned the test piece was 2500 meters instead of today’s standard
2000 I literally had to close the book and shudder. The thought of an extra 500
meters of absolute effort made me want to cry, but props to Irwin for managing
to put me deep into his story to feel that way.
In
other areas Irwin’s technique becomes suspect. He starts with the most subtle
foreshadowing but it grows to the point where about half way through the book I
knew what was going to happen. Granted I had started the book with a few
suspicions and had pretty much called the plot a few chapters in, but thanks to
Irwin’s detail about rowing and the general pacing of the story, I didn’t mind.
By the end of the novel though the foreshadowing has become so obvious one of
the characters calls attention to it. “I can’t believe he did this. It’s the
exact same thing that this guy did,” (to paraphrase). Now this moment can
either be read as wonderfully meta-literary, with Irwin showing a sense of
humor about his own work, or it is worthy of a double face palm for the way it
patronizes the reader, forcing them to acknowledge foreshadowing that they
obviously already picked up on. I’d like to believe the former, since the rest
of Irwin’s writing, particularly the framing story, is quite good.
Ah
the framing story. Besides the rowing bits, this was by far my favorite element
of Flat Water Tuesday. Here Irwin gives the reader the perspective of
Rob Carrey fifteen years after he graduates from Fenton. It is a story of a modern relationship
and the terrible tragedies of life that is told in a genuine voice that I loved
reading. Rob has been living with his girlfriend Carolyn for five years and
their relationship is failing. Slowly, over the course of the novel we find out
why and this was the only part of the book that emotionally moved me. Carolyn
is a wonderfully complex character and the situation she and Rob find
themselves in will tug at any heartstrings. Their story could probably stand
alone as a novel in its own right. That being said, it ties in relatively
seamlessly with Rob’s recollections of his year at Fenton and the two plot
lines come crashing together at the end of the novel in an ending that while
not necessarily satisfying still worked for me on the whole. If you are a rower
this is a must read. If you aren’t but just enjoy human emotion, I’d say go for
it as well.
Thanks for the review. I am sorry the copy you had did have those errors, which were part of an early manuscript. I would be very interested to learn more about what you found in your advance version. The mistake regarding Margot (who calls Rob and says she is in Boston but then is in NY by the end of the novel) was a logistical issue. I didn't her to be just a cab ride away when she gets in touch with Rob! So interesting that you found that error, which we red lined months before official publication. Would love to know more just to compare. My mail is rhirwin5@yahoo.com
ReplyDelete